Field note · February 16, 2024
What variant actually contains in ab-test-checkout
6,000 rows, 3 distinct values, and the one fact about variant that changes how you query it.
Working through ab-test-checkout again. variant is the column people trip over, so here is what it actually looks like.
6,000 rows, no nulls, 3 distinct values. control, variant_a, or variant_b.
3 values, and they are not evenly spread: variant_b 34.8%, control 32.9%, variant_a 32.3%. The largest takes 34.8% on its own.
Read the distinct list rather than the distinct count. Casing differences and trailing whitespace produce values that look identical in a report and group separately in SQL, and the count will not show you that — select distinct variant order by 1 will, in about a second.
select
count(*) as rows,
count(variant) as present,
count(*) - count(variant) as nulls,
count(distinct variant) as distinct_values
from ab_test_checkout;Low cardinality, stable values — this is a column you can group by without thinking about it, and a reasonable candidate for a chart facet. Check the distinct list, not just the count, because a stray casing variant hides in the count and shows up in the group-by.
Where this bites: a group-by on this column produces 3 rows today. If it is a column an upstream system can add values to, it produces an unknown number tomorrow, and any dashboard laid out for 3 categories reflows without warning. Values arriving is a schema change that no schema check catches.
The grain is one row per exposed user, which is the context every one of those numbers depends on. None of them survive a change of grain, which is why "profile the column" and "profile the table" are the same job. Full schema, and the CSV, on the dataset page.