Field note · November 21, 2025

Reading reading_at before trusting it in sensor-telemetry

8,000 rows, all distinct, and the one fact about reading_at that changes how you query it.

1 min read ·Data quality ·quality practice

Profiling reading_at on sensor-telemetry before anyone builds anything on top of it.

8,000 rows, no nulls, 8,000 distinct values. Reading time, UTC. Irregular spacing.

It runs from 2023-01-01 00:10:00 to 2023-02-28 19:20:00, covering 59 distinct days.

It is a timestamp, not a date, which means every comparison against a bare date is a comparison against midnight. reading_at <= date '2023-06-30' silently excludes almost all of 30 June. Half-open ranges — >= start and < end — avoid the whole class of off-by-one-day bugs and read no worse.

sql
select
  count(*)                     as rows,
  count(reading_at)            as present,
  count(*) - count(reading_at) as nulls,
  count(distinct reading_at)   as distinct_values
from sensor_telemetry;

Check the range before filtering on it. Half the "the dashboard is empty" reports we have seen are a date filter outside the data's actual range, and the query is not wrong so nothing errors.

Where this bites: 59 populated days is what any window function over this column has to work with. A seven-day lag counts rows, not days — so if a day is missing, lag(7) quietly compares against eight days ago and the week-over-week number is wrong in a way that looks plausible.

The grain is one row per sensor reading, which is the context every one of those numbers depends on. None of them survive a change of grain, which is why "profile the column" and "profile the table" are the same job. Full schema, and the CSV, on the dataset page.